You Didn't Have to Be a Witch to Get Burned. You Just Had to Be Inconvenient.
Quick Answer
Who were the victims of the European witch trials? The European witch trials (roughly 1450 to 1750) killed between 40,000 and 60,000 people, approximately 75 to 80 percent of them women. The accused were disproportionately older women, widows, midwives and folk healers, women who owned property, women who had disputes with neighbors, and women who violated the gender expectations of their communities. The witch trial was not a hunt for practitioners of magic. It was a mechanism for eliminating women the community found threatening, inconvenient, or in possession of something someone else wanted.
The witch trials of early modern Europe were not medieval. That gets said more than it gets understood. The peak years were the 16th and 17th centuries, during the Renaissance and the Reformation, when Europe was producing Galileo and Shakespeare and also burning women at a rate that would not be matched until the 20th century found newer methods. Between 40,000 and 60,000 people were executed for witchcraft across three centuries. About four in five of them were women. The question worth asking is not why people believed in witches. The question is why the category kept filling up with the same kinds of women.
What the Malleus Maleficarum said about women
In 1486, a Dominican inquisitor named Heinrich Kramer published the Malleus Maleficarum, the Hammer of Witches. It was a manual: how to identify a witch, how to interrogate her, how to obtain a confession, how to execute her. Kramer had been run out of Innsbruck the previous year by the local bishop, who called him a senile old man and dissolved his tribunal for procedural abuses. He went home and wrote the book instead.
The Malleus was printed on the Gutenberg press and spread across Europe in multiple editions. It argued that women were more susceptible to diabolical temptation because of their inherent weakness, their insatiable lust, and their deficiency of intellect. The Latin root of "femina," Kramer explained, was "fe" (faith) and "minus" (less). Women were, by etymology, less faithful. He had invented the etymology. It spread anyway.
The Catholic Church did not officially endorse the Malleus. It did not need to. Both Catholic and Protestant authorities prosecuted witches vigorously throughout the period, sometimes competing to do it more thoroughly than the other side. The Reformation did not interrupt the witch trials. It accelerated them.
The social profile of who got accused
The historians who have done the actual archival work, pulling trial records across Germany, England, Scotland, France, and Switzerland, find consistent patterns in who got accused. Older women, especially widows. Women who had recently inherited property. Women who worked as midwives or folk healers. Women known in their communities as disagreeable, sharp-tongued, or unwilling to defer. Women who had been in disputes with neighbors over debts, fences, or livestock. Women who lived alone and had no male relative to speak for them.
The folk healer angle deserves its own paragraph. Across early modern Europe, villages depended on women who knew herbs, who helped with difficult births, who treated fevers with plant knowledge passed down for generations. These women were called cunning folk in England. They were essential. They were also the first people blamed when a child died or livestock sickened. The same knowledge that made you useful made you a suspect. There was no clean line between healing and harming in a world where both operated through means that couldn't be fully explained, and the accusation moved easily from one side to the other.
How it worked: torture, confession, names
Almost every confession obtained in a witch trial was obtained under torture. The standard procedure was to arrest someone, torture them until they confessed to making a pact with the devil, and then torture them further until they named their accomplices. Each name produced a new arrest. Each new arrest produced new names. The Prince-Bishop of Würzburg executed roughly 300 people between 1626 and 1631 using this method. The Trier witch trials, beginning in 1581, essentially emptied two villages before the prosecutor was finally removed from his position.
The witch's mark, a spot on the body insensitive to pain, was used as physical evidence. Professional witch prickers were paid to find it. Any mole, birthmark, scar, or additional nipple could serve. The examination was conducted by men, on women's bodies, in public. The accused had no meaningful legal representation and no viable defense. Denying guilt was taken as evidence of guilt. Confessing was evidence of guilt. The only variable was whether you died quickly or slowly.
What the trials were actually for
Historians have spent decades arguing about this, and the honest answer is that the trials served several functions simultaneously, and not all accusers had the same motive.
Sociologist Keith Thomas, in his 1971 study Religion and the Decline of Magic, identified a pattern in English witch accusations: they frequently followed a refusal of charity. You turned away a poor neighbor who asked for help. Shortly afterward, your cow died or your child fell ill. You accused the neighbor of cursing you. The accusation resolved the guilt and explained the misfortune. The neighbor, who was already poor and isolated, went to trial. In this reading, the witch accusation was a way of punishing the person whose need you had failed to meet.
In other cases the mechanism was simpler. A widow owned land someone else wanted. An older woman had a property dispute with a more powerful family. A healer knew things that made men uncomfortable. The accusation was available. It required no evidence beyond testimony, and testimony was easy to obtain from people who believed in witches and had reasons to want a particular woman gone. In the German principalities during the Thirty Years' War, when authority had collapsed and communities were under sustained pressure, the trials took on a character closer to mass panic. The accused included children, men, and eventually the wives and relatives of the accusers themselves, at which point the trials typically ended.
When it ended and what that tells you
The European witch trials declined in the late 17th and early 18th centuries as the educated classes stopped believing in demonic pacts. The scientific revolution changed what counted as evidence. Courts raised evidentiary standards. Torture was restricted or abolished. The last execution for witchcraft in England was 1682. In Scotland, 1727. In the Holy Roman Empire, an execution in 1782 in Switzerland was widely condemned at the time as an embarrassing throwback.
What ended the trials was not a recognition that the accused were innocent. It was a shift in what the educated classes found plausible. The women who had been convicted under the old standards were not exonerated. The knowledge that killing them had been wrong did not produce any particular urgency about doing better by the women who remained. The machinery stopped. The social conditions that had kept it running did not.
The Hex The Patriarchy T-shirt is for everyone who has read the actual trial records and found the phrase newly literal. The Granddaughters of Witches Tank is for the ones who know whose granddaughters they are. The full Girl Power collection is for people who are tired of explaining why this is still relevant. For the American version of the same pattern in 1692 Massachusetts, where 19 people were hanged and none of them were witches either, The Salem Witch Trials covers the specific mechanics of how that particular community turned on itself.
Murder Apparel is an independent, husband-and-wife brand making spooky, political gear for people who give a damn. We donate to fight injustice and support communities in need. 500,000+ weirdos on Instagram. Come find your people.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who were the real victims of the witch trials?
The European witch trials (approximately 1450 to 1750) killed between 40,000 and 60,000 people, about 75 to 80 percent of them women. The accused were disproportionately older women and widows, midwives and folk healers, women involved in property disputes, women who were socially isolated or had no male relatives to defend them, and women whose communities found them threatening, disagreeable, or simply inconvenient. The witch trial was not a systematic persecution of people practicing magic. It was a mechanism that could be deployed against women who didn't fit the accepted social order.
What was the Malleus Maleficarum?
The Malleus Maleficarum, or "Hammer of Witches," was a manual for identifying, interrogating, and prosecuting witches, published in 1486 by Dominican inquisitor Heinrich Kramer. Printed using the Gutenberg press, it spread across Europe in multiple editions and provided a theological and procedural framework for witch persecution. The book argued that women were inherently more susceptible to diabolical temptation due to their weakness and lustfulness. The Catholic Church never officially endorsed it, but both Catholic and Protestant authorities used it as a reference throughout the height of the witch trial era.
Why were women disproportionately accused of witchcraft?
Women were disproportionately accused for reasons that had more to do with gender, economics, and social power than with actual belief in women's magical abilities. Women who owned property were vulnerable to accusations that could transfer that property. Women with medical or herbal knowledge were both necessary and easy to blame when treatments failed. Women who lived outside the standard social structures, as widows, single women, or women who disputed authority, had no male protectors and fewer institutional resources to defend themselves. The accusation of witchcraft was a legal and social tool that happened to be most effective when used against people who were already marginalized.
How did the European witch trials end?
The European witch trials declined through the late 17th and into the 18th century as the educated and legal classes stopped accepting demonic pacts as a plausible explanation for misfortune. Courts raised evidentiary standards and restricted or abolished torture, which had been the primary means of obtaining the confessions that drove the trials. The last execution for witchcraft in England was in 1682, in Scotland in 1727, and one of the last documented executions in the Holy Roman Empire occurred in Switzerland in 1782. The change was driven by a shift in elite beliefs about what constituted credible evidence, not by any formal recognition that the executed had been innocent.
Were any of the accused actually practicing witchcraft?
No. Many of the accused, particularly midwives and folk healers, practiced folk medicine using herbal knowledge and traditional remedies, which were distinct from any concept of diabolical witchcraft. Some practiced forms of folk magic, charms, and protective rituals that were widespread in early modern European communities and were legally distinct from the demonic witchcraft described in the Malleus Maleficarum. Confessions to demonic pacts were obtained under torture and followed consistent scripted patterns, describing what interrogators wanted to hear rather than actual events. The people who maintained their innocence and refused to confess were typically executed anyway.
How many people were killed in the European witch trials?
Historians estimate that between 40,000 and 60,000 people were executed across the European witch trials, which ran roughly from the mid-15th century to the early 18th century, with the peak intensity in the 16th and 17th centuries. About 75 to 80 percent of those executed were women. Germany saw the highest concentration of trials: the Prince-Bishop of Würzburg alone executed approximately 300 people in the late 1620s. The trials were not a medieval phenomenon but a product of the early modern period, running parallel to the Renaissance, the Reformation, and the Scientific Revolution.
